configuracion grafica

Responder
Mensaje
Autor
dresam
Mensajes: 91
Registrado: 24 Jun 2015, 19:05

configuracion grafica

#1 Mensaje por dresam » 04 May 2017, 17:17

Buenas tardes.
Parece que con cada actualización el DCS me va peor. Tengo un i5 3,1 gh 8 de ram tarjeta nvidia 750TI de 2 Gb.
Me podéis ayudar para lograr buena calidad con buenos frames. Gracias.

Avatar de Usuario
PA_Overlord
Piloto Nivel III
Mensajes: 1854
Registrado: 02 Jul 2011, 12:44
Contactar:

Re: configuracion grafica

#2 Mensaje por PA_Overlord » 05 May 2017, 01:45

Facil ponlo todo en medio.
carga una mision con unas cuentas unidades, que no sean pocas pero tampoco hacen falta potocientasmil.

antialising y todo eso desconectado.
Los gases de motor desconectado.
El agua a lo minimo y las sombras tambien, de esto prescindiras mas que de otras cosas, a menos que vueles helos que la sombra cuenta.
y a partir de ahi sube o baja empieza por las texturas.

No hay perfiles validos para cada equipo, cuenta mas como lo veas tu, deberias poder mantener mas de 50 fps para ser volable con garantias sin que te baje de los 30. No hay magias para aumentar FPS...excepto gastarte la pasta.

http://TANQUESYBLINDADOS.blogspot.com/ Historia del Carro de Combate
http://www.youtube.com/user/boalman/ Mi Canal en el Tubo
Imagen

dresam
Mensajes: 91
Registrado: 24 Jun 2015, 19:05

Re: configuracion grafica

#3 Mensaje por dresam » 05 May 2017, 07:40

Gracias. Overlord. Y el panel de controlo de la grafica de nvidia, lo toco o no hago nada?? Buen dia

Avatar de Usuario
ESA_Flankercobra
Piloto Nivel II
Mensajes: 888
Registrado: 03 Oct 2012, 08:32

Re: configuracion grafica

#4 Mensaje por ESA_Flankercobra » 05 May 2017, 14:24

¿Qué DCSW estás ejecutando?, Nevada o el Cáucaso.

Si estás ejecutando Nevada, con 8 Gb de RAM vas a tener problemas, sobre todo en multiplayer, yo te recomendaría algo más (16Gb).

En el Caucaso, como dice Overlord, tienes que jugar con los recursos que "comen" fps y los más recurrido en ponerlo por defecto en medio.

Con una serie 750..., algún compañero estuvo ejecutando el sim con estos ajustes (pero con un micro más potente y más RAM):
Imagen
Imagen
ImagenImagenImagen

dresam
Mensajes: 91
Registrado: 24 Jun 2015, 19:05

Re: configuracion grafica

#5 Mensaje por dresam » 29 Jun 2017, 18:09

Buenas tardes.
Vuelvo a traer el tema ahora, pues me he comprado el mapa de normandia.
Tengo un i5 4440 a 3,1ghz y tarjeta grafica nvidia gtx 750 TI.y 8 de Ram.En el mapa del caucaso hasta las ultimas actualizaciones conseguía cifras de 60 fps continuos y con buena calidad.Ahora tanto en caucaso como en Normandía el contador de fps se vuelve loco dando un baile continuo de cifras que van de picos de mas de 90fps pasando a 62 fps y mínimos de 15 fps pasando por cifras en torno a 40 fps, vamos que es impracticable, a pesar de seguir el consejo de bajar la calidad de los efectos. Agradecería mucho vuestra ayuda. Saludos

Avatar de Usuario
PA_Overlord
Piloto Nivel III
Mensajes: 1854
Registrado: 02 Jul 2011, 12:44
Contactar:

Re: configuracion grafica

#6 Mensaje por PA_Overlord » 29 Jun 2017, 18:28

una 750 quieras que no se queda ya un poco atras, no quiero decir que la cambies pero puede tener algo que ver.

Ademas en las actualizaciones de DCS siempre acostumbran a estropear algo, a veces pasa :ymdevil:, echa un vistaza a los nuevos drivers y vuelve a ajustar los graficos....otra idea, yo mientras esperaba una nueva actualizacion me dedicaba a otro sim mas serio, al menos en lo que se refiere a fiabilidad y acabado....jajaja

http://TANQUESYBLINDADOS.blogspot.com/ Historia del Carro de Combate
http://www.youtube.com/user/boalman/ Mi Canal en el Tubo
Imagen

dresam
Mensajes: 91
Registrado: 24 Jun 2015, 19:05

Re: configuracion grafica

#7 Mensaje por dresam » 29 Jun 2017, 19:35

Gracias overlord. La verdad que en cuanto a rendimiento el BoS es insuperable, pero no me acaba de gustar la neblina que se ve y tampoco me convence el modelo de vuelo- son muy flotones, parecen barcos en vez de aviones- Estoy deseando que por fin salga el parche 5 del Clod, no sé como va la cosa, parece que se alarga en exceso. Saludos.

Avatar de Usuario
PA_Overlord
Piloto Nivel III
Mensajes: 1854
Registrado: 02 Jul 2011, 12:44
Contactar:

Re: configuracion grafica

#8 Mensaje por PA_Overlord » 29 Jun 2017, 19:44

dresam escribió:Gracias overlord. La verdad que en cuanto a rendimiento el BoS es insuperable, pero no me acaba de gustar la neblina que se ve y tampoco me convence el modelo de vuelo- son muy flotones, parecen barcos en vez de aviones- Estoy deseando que por fin salga el parche 5 del Clod, no sé como va la cosa, parece que se alarga en exceso. Saludos.
Todavia hablabamos ayer de esa "flotabilidad" que al que no esta acostumbrado parece raro, y lo es a mi me costo un poco acostumbrarse, no se si sera exagerada o no... por que pilotos de las segunada no conozco ninguno :D pero la verdad que es que es asi como se comporta un avion pequeño...otra cosa es que aqui hayan "saturado" esa parte....pero lo cierto es que a dio de hoy difruta de mas jugabilidad que la competencia... en fins... yo no veo ninguna niebla....

http://TANQUESYBLINDADOS.blogspot.com/ Historia del Carro de Combate
http://www.youtube.com/user/boalman/ Mi Canal en el Tubo
Imagen

Avatar de Usuario
PA_Abigor
Piloto Nivel III
Mensajes: 1222
Registrado: 27 Oct 2011, 12:21

Re: configuracion grafica

#9 Mensaje por PA_Abigor » 29 Jun 2017, 21:27

La neblina aparece a según que horas del día, y a mi la verdad es que me gusta el efecto :D

Respecto al modelo de vuelo, lo han retocado en unos cuantos parches, no paran de hacer pequeñas modificaciones para mejorarlo. Es cierto que al principio era exagerado ese efecto de flotar, botaban mucho en los aterrizajes, y tendían ha hacer trompos en tierra con nada que tocaras los pedales. Ahora mismo no tiene nada que ver cómo se comportan los aviones con aquellas primeras versiones.

Y siguen afinándolo: Developer Diary 161 (próximo parche que saldrá en Agosto)
=========CHANGES implemented during 5 months’ work on the FM fix that will be in update 2.012=============

Common changes:

1. Aircraft stability along the pitch and yaw axes has been reworked. Planes reaction to control surfaces input became much less volatile and closer to reality.
2. Aircraft controllability was tuned simultaneously with the stability in the same control channels. Control surfaces inputs in different flight conditions became more realistic. Aircraft handling became much less 'sharp' and more convenient and predictable.
3. Roll 'dipping' after a full rudder input has been significantly decreased for all aircraft. Flat turns, coordinated side-slipping (straight banked flight with full rudder input for braking) and other maneuvers with side slipping motion at large angles became much closer to real ones.
4. Time of stabilizers and trimmers shift from end to end made more realistic.
5. Trim effectiveness has been corrected for several aircraft to correspond to the updated balance boundaries.
6. Load increase of the control surfaces has been corrected as the speed increases, changing aircraft controllability at various flight speeds and making them function closer to real data.
7. Because of the tuned stability characteristics, aircraft lose directional stability in an event of horizontal surfaces destruction.
8. Because of the tuned stability characteristics, aircraft lose lateral stability in an event of vertical surfaces destruction.
9. Because of the tuned controllability and stability and additional stall tuning, aircraft stall behavior changed. An aircraft sticks less in a spin, spin recovery became easier and more predictable. Therefore, an aircraft behavior during stall and spin became closer to the real thing. If there was a specific spin data available for an aircraft, it was taken into account to make the FM even more accurate (additional details follow below).
10. Thanks to aircraft stability and controllability changes taxiing and take-off and landing runs became more predictable and controllable.
11. Run-down time of the freely rotating landing gear wheels has been decreased by increasing friction values in the wheel bearings.
12. Landing gear brakes friction has been increased, making the aircraft stopping and holding while revving the engine(s) easier.
13. Air flow at beyond-stall AoA is now modeled better, making bobbling and shaking during a stall more realistic.
14. Control surfaces buffeting values at high flight speeds have been tuned: amplitudes were lowered, frequencies increased.
15. Flight stick and pedals shifting speed became slower even more due to increased load at high flight speeds.
16. Oscillation delay time of the sideslip indicator (the small ball) has been corrected.
17. Aircraft fragments behavior (unnaturally smooth fall of detached ailerons, elevators, rudders, etc.) has been corrected, especially at high speeds.

Additional clarification on fixes of Soviet planes:

LaGG-3 series 29:
1. Landing gear physics model has been revised. Now the aircraft is much less prone to 'circling', it is now possible to turn at 15-25 km/h speed without using brakes.
2. Take-off characteristics in crosswinds improved.
3. Pedals load at various flight conditions has been corrected (significantly increased at low speeds and significantly decreased at high speeds).
4. Pitch balance and its dependence on the flaps have been corrected.
5. Rudder, elevator and ailerons trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
6. Elevator trim effectiveness has been decreased.

La-5 series 8:
1. Landing gear physics model has been revised. Now the aircraft is much less prone to 'circling', it is now possible to turn at 15-25 km/h speed without using brakes.
2. Pedals load at various flight conditions has been corrected (increased at low speeds and decreased at high speeds).
3. Pitch balance and its dependence on the flaps have been corrected.
4. Rudder, elevator and ailerons trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
5. The aircraft stall behavior has been corrected using the data available. The stall in a level flight doesn't end in a spin, the aircraft proceeds to 'pancake', keeping the roll controllability. In a case of intentional spin entry, spin recovery requires intensive rudder input while failure to give it can result in a significant spin recovery delay.

I-16 type 24:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the landing flap have been corrected.
2. Flight stick load along the roll axis at medium and high flight speeds has been slightly increased.
3. Pedals load at various flight conditions has been corrected (increased at low speeds and decreased at high speeds).
4. Extended landing flap pitches the aircraft up significantly, on the glide path this must be compensated by flight stick movement forward.
5. Stall speed with the landing flap and gear extended is 3-4 km/h lower than with them retracted.
6. The aircraft stall behavior has been checked using the data available. The stall readily results in a spin, spin recovery requires intensive rudder input while failure to give it can result in a significant spin recovery delay.

MiG-3 series 24:
1. Roll rate at various flight conditions has been corrected (decreased at medium and high speeds).
2. Pitch balance and its dependence on the flaps have been corrected.
3. Elevator trim effectiveness has been decreased.
4. Elevator and rudder trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
5. Flight stick load along the roll axis at high flight speeds has been slightly decreased.
6. Pedals load at various flight conditions has been corrected (significantly increased at low speeds and significantly decreased at high speeds).
7. The aircraft stall behavior has been corrected using the data available. The stall in a level flight readily ends in a spin, spin recovery doesn't require much effort.

Yak-1 series 69/127:
1. Pitch balance has been corrected.
2. Flight stick load along the pitch axis has been increased at high flight speeds.
3. Flight stick load along the roll axis has been corrected at any flight speeds.
4. Pedals load at medium and high flight speeds has been increased significantly.
5. Elevator trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
6. Elevator trim effectiveness has been decreased.
7. The neutral roll position of the flight stick that was incorrect for joysticks without FFB has been corrected.
8. The aircraft stall behavior has been checked using the data available. The stall readily results in a spin, spin recovery requires intensive rudder input while failure to give it can result in a significant spin recovery delay.

P-40E-1:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the landing flaps has been corrected.
2. Pedals load at various flight conditions has been corrected (slightly increased at low speeds and decreased at high speeds).
3. The landing flaps drag has been decreased.
4. The aircraft stall behavior has been corrected using the data available. The stall in a level flight doesn't end in a spin, the aircraft proceeds to 'pancake'.

IL-2 mod. 1941/42/43:
1. Flight stick and pedals load at any flight speeds have been increased significantly.
2. Elevator trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
3. The number of complete revolutions of the elevator trim handle in the cockpit has been increased.
4. The aircraft stall behavior has been corrected using the data available. The stall in a level flight doesn't end in a spin, the aircraft proceeds to 'pancake'. The stall in a turn ends in a spin.

Pe-2 series 35/87/110:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the landing flaps have been corrected.
2. Propellers backwash influence on the aircraft has been decreased.
3. Elevator trim effectiveness has been decreased.
4. Rudder, elevator and ailerons trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
5. Pedals load at various flight conditions has been corrected (increased at low speeds and decreased at high speeds).
6. Flight stick load along the pitch axis has been increased at any flight speeds.
7. Pe-2 series 87 water radiators increase drag correctly as they are opened (previously the left engine radiators didn't increase drag while the right engine radiators affected the drag for both engine nacelles).

Additional clarification on fixes of German planes:

Bf 109 E-7:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the horizontal stabilizer and flaps have been corrected.2. Flight stick load at any flight speeds has been corrected (increased at low speeds and decreased at high speeds).
3. Flight stick load along the roll axis at high flight speeds has been increased.
4. Pedals load at medium and high flight speeds has been increased significantly.
5. Horizontal stabilizer shift time from end to end increased from 5 to 15 seconds according to the reference video.
6. Flaps extension time increased from 15 to 20 seconds according to the reference video.
7. The aircraft flight model is corrected to correspond to other aircraft FM (its difference was caused by attempts to fix the roll issues quickly).
8. Pushing the flight stick forward abruptly is less likely to cause an inverted snap roll or reverse spin.
9. The aircraft stall behavior has been corrected using the data available. The stall danger in a turn if an excessive flight stick input has been given is minimal.

Bf 109 F-2/F-4/G-2/G-4:
1. Their roll rate at various flight conditions has been corrected (decreased at medium and high speeds).
2. Pedals load at high flight speeds has been decreased.
3. Pitch balance and its dependence on the horizontal stabilizer and flaps have been corrected.
4. Horizontal stabilizer shift time from end to end increased from 5 to 15 seconds according to the reference video.
5. Flaps extension time increased from 15 to 20 seconds according to the reference video.
6. Flight stick load along the pitch axis has been increased at low and medium flight speeds.
7. Flight stick load along the roll axis at medium and high flight speeds has been increased significantly.
8. Pedals load at low and medium flight speeds has been increased.
9. Pushing the flight stick forward abruptly is less likely to cause an inverted snap roll or reverse spin.
10. The additional research on the aircraft stall has been performed using the data available. It stalls in a turn if an excessive flight stick input has been given. Spin recovery doesn't require much effort.

Fw-190 A3/A4:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the horizontal stabilizer and flaps have been corrected.
2. Flight stick load along the roll axis has been slightly corrected at any flight speeds.
3. Pedals load at various flight conditions has been corrected (increased at low speeds and decreased at high speeds).
4. The additional research on the aircraft stall has been performed using the data available. It stalls in a turn if an excessive flight stick input has been given. The stall starts very quickly after pre-stall buffeting.

MC.202 series VIII:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the horizontal stabilizer and flaps have been corrected.
2. Flight stick load along the pitch axis has been decreased at high flight speeds.
3. Flight stick load along the roll axis has been corrected at any flight speeds.
4. Pedals load at various flight conditions has been corrected (increased at low speeds and decreased at high speeds).
5. Horizontal stabilizer shift time from end to end increased from 5 to 15 seconds.

Ju 87 D-3:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the flaps have been corrected.
2. Flight stick load along the pitch and roll axes and pedals load have been increased at high flight speeds.
3. Rudder and elevator trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
4. Elevator trim effectiveness has been decreased.
5. Propeller backwash influence on the aircraft has been increased (now more rudder input is required during a take-off run).

Bf 110 E-2/G-2:
1. Course stability while taxiing has been improved.
2. Pitch balance and its dependence on the horizontal stabilizer and flaps have been corrected.
3. Propellers backwash influence on the aircraft has been decreased.
4. Pedals load at medium and high flight speeds has been decreased.
5. Flight stick load along the pitch axis at medium and high flight speeds has been increased.
6. Elevator trim effectiveness has been decreased.
7. Rudder and elevator trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
8. Engine nacelles drag correctly increases as they are damaged.
9. The aircraft is much less controllable at high AoA, now it stalls uncontrollably if you attempt extreme maneuvers.
10. The rotation rate in a flat turn is set according to the reference.
11. Aircraft stall in a level flight is much 'softer', without the tendency to enter a spin, as described in the reference article.

He 111 H-6/H-16:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the horizontal stabilizer and flaps have been corrected.
2. Flight stick load along the roll axis at high flight speeds has been decreased.
3. Pedals load at various flight conditions has been corrected (increased at low speeds and decreased at high speeds).
4. Flight stick load at various flight conditions has been corrected (increased at low speeds and decreased at high speeds).
5. Elevator, rudder and ailerons effectiveness has been decreased.
6. Rudder and ailerons trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
7. Elevator trim shift time from end to end increased from 7 to 8 seconds.
8. Course stability while taxiing has been improved.
9. An issue with He-111 H6 roll trim after the right aileron loss has been fixed.
10. Water and oil radiators increase drag correctly as they are opened (previously the left engine radiators didn't increase drag while the right engine radiators affected the drag for both engine nacelles).
11. Engine nacelles drag correctly increases as they are damaged.
12. The misalignment of the animated and physical (true) position of the landing gear during its extension and retraction has been removed.

Ju 88 A-4:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the flaps have been corrected.
2. Flight stick load along the pitch axis at any flight speeds has been increased.
3. Flight stick load along the roll axis at high flight speeds has been decreased.
4. Pedals load at high flight speeds has been significantly decreased.
5. Elevator trim effectiveness has been decreased.
6. Rudder trim shift time from end to end increased from 6 to 8 seconds.
7. Ailerons trim shift time from end to end increased from 5 to 8 seconds.
8. Engine nacelles drag correctly increases as they are damaged.
9. Bottom turret drag correctly increases as it's damaged.

Ju 52/3mg 4e:
1. Pitch balance and its dependence on the horizontal stabilizer and flaps have been corrected.
2. Flight stick load along the pitch axis at medium and high flight speeds has been slightly increased.
3. Pedals load at medium and high flight speeds has been significantly decreased.
4. Engine nacelles drag correctly increases as they are damaged.

============================
Imagen

Responder

Volver a “DCS”

¿Quién está conectado?

Usuarios navegando por este Foro: No hay usuarios registrados visitando el Foro y 1 invitado